Summary

I think I've explored this topic to an acceptable degree. Laura made some good points last night about the validity of the logic, but stressed that logic wasn't everything. And that's where we disagree. I think one should act logically. That's the ideal. This doesn't mean you can't love someone, you don't have to be a robot. You just have to be able to defend your actions to an acceptable degree. So, when it comes to morality, I want morals logical.

Of course, I'll admit this is all theory. I think that I, personally, could handle because I value logic more than I value my individual desires. The one thing that keeps me going is obtaining a job teaching English in a school that lets me do what I want to do. Diversify education, focusing on enjoyment, personal exploration, and actually learning things of value (ie, writing, critical thinking, and debating civily). Everything else is just bonus points.

I doubt I'll ever get a chance to try the whole "polyamory" thing. I doubt that I'll even need it, although I still believe it could heighten life if done correctly. I just don't think most people in this generation could handle it. I'm not thoroughly convinced I could, although I've got a better shot than most. But you can be sure that if I have a kid, I'm going to teach him/her that other people's happiness is just as (but not more) important as their own. That love is not one thing between a man and a woman, but a bond between a person and humanity. Or select members. An exclusive orgy, if you will.

Which you won't. But they might. Oh jeez, I've already given "the talk," and I don't even want kids yet. Oy vey.